This is for all the people who buy cameras based on megapixels.
I was really surprised last night that a close friend who is involved in photography basically had an ass-backwards notion about megapixels... Here's what I know(- the profanity I used in my original explanation at the pub...):
First of all, more mega-pixels does not = better, and more data. When you buy a camera, you have to know that Digital SLR's have larger sensors inside of them than compact digital cameras... so the quality coming out of a 8 mega-pixel SLR kills the quality out of something like the G9 which boasts 12.whatever megapixels. (On a side note, the Canon G10 is
I'm sure VRay is an excellent purchase. Really, I am. But I am not getting the results I was hoping for... I know there is a learning curve as with any renderer, but I am finding Vray to be very frustrating as far as getting a decent render, and since I really wanted it (the proxies kick ass, now if only I could get the exposure to work.) and the firm bought it for me I would really like to show them some results.
Looks like trusty ol'MR is still number one... for now.
Hey, Ive been looking at your gallery and it is very impressive. Are you a professional visualization expert? Or do you work in architecture or landscape architecture? Im a landscape architecture student in Canada, I love working in max, but level is still really low. Im working on teaching myself, but its a slow process. Maybe ill put some up